Supreme Court declares Aadhaar Card as Constitutionally valid, says 'No need to link bank account, mobile numbers'
Aadhaar Card Verdict: Court also ruled that "Aadhaar empowers the marginalised section of the society and gives them an identity, Aadhaar is also different from other ID proofs as it can't be duplicated"
- The Court also stated that one should be ‘better than the best’, and by being unique one becomes the ‘only one’
- The court further stated that minimal demographic and biometric data of citizens are collected by the UIDAI for Aadhaar enrolment. Aadhaar number given to a person is unique and can't go to any other person.
- Justice Chandrachud said that "Aadhaar violates the right to privacy as it could possibly lead to profiling of persons and voters"
- Court ruled that it is still mandatory to have adhaar for issuing a PAN card and for filing Income Tax Returns
- There is a fundamental difference between Aadhaar card and identity. Once the bio-metric information is stored, it remains in the system.
- Empowering the validity of Aadhaar, court stated that “Aadhaar empowers the marginalised section of the society and gives them an identity; Aadhaar is also different from other ID proofs as it can't be duplicated".
- A five-judge constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra had on May 10 reserved the verdict on the matter after a marathon hearing that went on for 38 days, spanning four-and-half months.
- The Apex court also ruled that private companies cannot ask for Aadhaar cards of customers
- The court further agreed that Aadhaar does barge into one’s personal space, but it has become very necessary.
- SC says Aadhaar authentication data cannot be stored for more than six months
- SC Constitution Bench strikes down the National security exception under the Aadhaar Act.
- Justice Sikri removed Section 57 of Aadhaar Act permitting private entities to avail Aadhaar data.
Where is Aadhaar Card not necessary?
- The court ruled that 99.96% people cannot be deprived of the facilities
- The Supreme Court ruled that Aadhaar is not necessary for taking admissions in schools and for appearing in UGC, NEET or CBSE examination
- Not mandatory to link Aadhaar with mobile phone numbers
- Not mandatory to link Aadhaar with bank accounts
The Centre, the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), the governments of Maharashtra and Gujarat and the RBI had argued in favour of the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits And Services) Act, 2016 and were represented by the Attorney General, Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, senior advocates Rakesh Dwivedi and Jayant Bhushan and lawyer Zoheb Hossain.
National Unity Day: A tribute to Sardar Patel | Master Stroke
What all changed after J&K officially bifurcated into 2 UTs? | Master Stroke
Israeli spyware Pegasus snooped on Indian Journalists through Whatsapp | Master Stroke
Maharashtra: Shiv Sena's Sanjay Raut Meets Sharad Pawar
Drill displays IED diffused with the help of a robot by NSG
Article 370 only gave separatism and terrorism to J&K: PM Modi in Kevadiya
Let us work towards making India $5 trillion economy: Modi To Trainee Civil Servant | Full Speech
Radio Stations in Jammu, Srinagar and Leh renamed
Jammu and Kashmir to witness 'Acche Din'? | Seedha Sawal
Expert advice on how to survive poor air quality in Delhi-NCR