Modi govt withholds state-wise data as malnutrition report shows Gujarat in poor light

By: admin
Updated: 17 Jul 2015 06:25 AM
New Delhi: For 10 months, the Narendra Modi administration withheld from the public the findings of a study by India's government and Unicef that charts "unprecedented" improvement in child malnutrition over the past decade but shows Gujarat in an unflattering light.

 


Under pressure after The Economist reported the findings a fortnight ago, the government last week released the national-level data from the Rapid Survey on Children. But it is still withholding the state-wise figures, questioning their accuracy.

 

Unicef has not expressed any concern about the data's correctness, though, and media speculation has it that the figures have been held back because they show the state Prime Minister Modi ruled for 13 years as lagging many poorer ones.

 

Government sources said the UPA government had commissioned the survey in November 2013 and the final report reached the Modi government in September last year.

 

But Dipa Sinha, a right to food campaigner, told The Telegraph an RTI query she had moved six months ago received a response only on June 30, saying the government had just a provisional report. The Congress on Thursday released the full findings, including the state-wise data.

 

According to the study, the national percentage of underweight children below the age of five has fallen from 42.5 a decade ago to about 29 - gains that Unicef's nutrition adviser for South Asia, Victor Aguayo, has been quoted as terming "unprecedented".

 

In Gujarat, the figure has dropped from 44.6 to 33.5 per cent, which is worse than the national average. "While UPA was winning the battle against malnutrition, Gujarat was losing it," the Congress crowed.

 

In absolute terms, India is far behind Africa, where 21 per cent children are underweight.

 

Gujarat also lagged the national average at 42 per cent for "stunting" (when children are unusually short for their age), 18.5 per cent for severe stunting, and 18.7 per cent for "wasting" (when children weigh too little for their height).

 

While the immunisation coverage in the country rose from 61 per cent in 2009 to 65.2 per cent, that in Gujarat fell from 56.6 to 56.2 per cent.

 

Modi had in an interview to The Wall Street Journal in 2012 attributed Gujarat's poor malnutrition figures to its largely vegetarian population and a middle class "more beauty-conscious than health-conscious".

 

"If a mother tells her daughter to have milk, they will have a fight. She will tell her mother, 'I won't drink milk, I'll get fat'. They have money but she's beauty-conscious, not health-conscious," the then Gujarat chief minister had claimed.

 

An official in Maneka Gandhi's women and child development ministry, which has uploaded the survey's national figures on its website, denied that the state-wise data had been held back because of Gujarat's figures.

 

"We never accepted the survey results as they contradict other surveys," he added, saying many states had objected to the findings and the health and statistics ministries questioned the survey's methodology.

 

Apparently, no such doubts assailed the survey's national figures. The ministry set up a panel to review the state-wise data only last month - no one was available to explain the delay. Maneka, away in Chhattisgarh, did not reply to text messages.

 

Media reports said the Rapid Survey was based on 2.1 lakh interviews across 29 states and Union territories in 2013 and 2014, and measured and weighed over 90,000 children and 28,000 teenage girls.

 

The "other surveys" that the official said it contradicts are the district-level health surveys done in 2013-14 across 21 states (but not Gujarat). Nutrition and food campaigner Vandana Prasad said these surveys differed with the Rapid Survey in some of the data but did not paint "a better or worse" picture overall.

 

The decade-old data the Rapid Survey has contrasted with its findings to determine the gains are from the Centre's National Family Health Survey of 2005-2006. The latest NFHS is now under way.

 

Prasad said the worst aspect of the withholding of the data was that it left everyone in the dark about the progress in fighting malnutrition.

 

"It's ridiculous that people working in the field have to beg for data from the government," she said. "Also, had they been made public, the budget cuts might not have happened."

 

The allocation for the Integrated Child Development Services was slashed from over Rs 18,000 crore in last July's budget to about Rs 8,000 crore in this year's Union budget, and that for the midday meal scheme from Rs 3,000 crore to Rs 1,200 crore.

 

The Rapid Survey lauds the performance of Maharashtra (at a time it was under a Congress-NCP government) as exemplary. It attributes the state's success to better feeding of infants, pregnancy care, higher incomes and motherhood at more mature ages as well as its outreach to the poorest, like the Adivasis.

 

It also paints BJP-ruled Madhya Pradesh and Nitish Kumar's Bihar as front-runners in improvement (though not in absolute figures).

 

The percentage of undernourished children dropped from 60 to 36 per cent in Madhya Pradesh, from 56 to 37 per cent in Bihar, and from 37 to 25 per cent in Maharashtra.

 

Nationally, the percentage of wasted children fell from 20 to 15 per cent, and that of stunted children from 48 to about 39 per cent. However, the survey found more than half of Uttar Pradesh's children below normal height.

 

It found more than a quarter of children stunted even among the wealthiest 20 per cent of Indian households, a probable fallout of rampant sexism. Over half of girls aged 15 to 18 were underweight, and therefore likelier to give birth to malnourished babies, media reports said.

 

The survey found failed deworming campaigns and poor breastfeeding practices. It blamed open defecation - whose practitioners have dropped from 55 per cent of the population a decade ago to 45 per cent - as a key cause for the spread of diseases that contribute to malnutrition.

 

"Holding the (state-wise) data back is leading to unnecessary speculation," said Biraj Patnaik, nutrition expert and Supreme Court-appointed principal adviser to the food commissioner. "As a nation, we have done well overall and though there may be inter-state variations, the government should make the data public."

 

SOURCE: www.telegraphindia.com

SHOP BY CATEGORIES

         
GET THE APP